In Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice, Darcy’s marriage proposal to Elizabeth ignites a chain reaction of events and moods that begin to construct the essential framework for a relationship between the two seemingly opposite characters. Now, Darcy has justified the very aspects of his character that Elizabeth seems to have the most trouble understanding. In a letter beforehand, Darcy explains to Elizabeth that Wickham actually tried to woo Darcy’s sister Georgiana, and that this is the sole reason behind their mutual distaste for each other. Furthermore, Elizabeth understands the manner in which Darcy approached her, and consequently begins to understand Darcy himself. Elizabeth, after randomly encountering Wickham, speaks briefly about Darcy and responds to allegations that he is quite different in character saying, “Yes…but I think Mr. Darcy improves on acquaintance” (199). Clearly Elizabeth is not yet fully impressed by Darcy and will require numerous other pieces of evidence that support Darcy as a non-arrogant, non-conceiting character, but for her to even utter this sentence displays a large sense understanding and development. Jane Austen uses these specific interactions between Wickham, and similar conversations with other characters, to establish a setting for Darcy’s character development as he rounds out his originally flat personality.
Elizabeth’s molding outlook on Darcy is subject to more positive change in the coming chapters, as Darcy himself presents his many decent and fundamental attributes. While touring Darcy’s Pemberley estate, Elizabeth is told the many qualities of Darcy that have gone unnoticed in the past. For example, while touring the estate, the housekeeper Mrs. Reynolds remarks that Darcy was “the sweetest-tempered, most generous-hearted boy in the world” (210) and that there were never any issues in the home. Taken aback, Elizabeth begins to seriously reconsider her perception of Darcy, and even goes as far as to picture herself as Darcy’s wife: “…and at that moment she felt that to be mistress of Pemberley might be something”. Jane Austen promotes the idea of an increasing development between Darcy and Elizabeth’s relationship, and indicates future examples of how the two will grow closer together. As Darcy’s character begins to round out, the construct of a typical romantic comedy begin to take shape and the original negative perceptions of Darcy begin to diminish.
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
Wednesday, April 10, 2013
Response to AP Literature OR from 1984
In response to
the AP Literature Open Response from 1984:
In
George Orwell’s 1984, the
incorporation of the Two Minutes Hate in the first few pages of the novel serve
to summarize the ultimate objective of The Party in Oceania as a means for
sustaining social hierarchy by channeling negative emotions away from the
government.
Winston describes the Two Minutes
Hate as a provocative campaign by The Party to redirect any negative emotions
towards a state-denounced enemy. This is exactly what the exercise is meant to
do. Since The Party obsesses with the idea of controlling human thought by
erasing all forms of domestic dissonance, they have their citizens engage in
group therapy where they verbally tear their enemy to shreds, seemingly reinforcing
one anothers thoughts of hatred with the support of the group. Winston remarks
how he is unable to prevent himself from screaming in disgust even though he
understands that The Party is trying to brainwash him and his comrades. This
scene stands out because it openly correlates The Party’s desired objectives
with their policies and methods for completing goals. By effectively teaching
their population to hate a sworn enemy, the government is eradicating all forms
of disapproval that would lay in opposition to maintaining a social hierarchical
system of an upper, middle, and lower class.
In the end, The Party strives to
maintain the typical hierarchy of classes that has existed in the generations that
preceded them, and does so especially through numerous methods of limited
expression. For example, The Party utilizes their own language (newspeak) in
order to abbreviate words and offer a sense of duality that result in
doublethink. Similarly, the Two Minutes Hate serves to diminish negative
emotions of the current government, and instead promote aggression towards an enemy.
In turn, this will lead the population to grow more of an appreciation for The
Party on the basis that they are fending off foreign insurgents. What is most
important to consider in this scene is how the transgression of anger and
hatred is channeled from one inherently malevolent object to a seemingly
harmless one. This merely represents how effective The Party can be when
enforcing certain policies and beliefs for their own benefit. The example of
Two Minutes Hate is effective because it encompasses both the objectives and
the strategies of The Party, where in the end any negative emotion is satisfied
and all there is left to do is appreciate the government for having defended
their own personal rights, even if this may not be the case. Ultimately, the
government wants to ensure the prosperity of the Inner Party (upper class)
within this social hierarchy. There apparent strategy for doing this is seen
through their efforts to minimize social aggression and dissent amongst the
population.
The Two Minutes Hate scene from
Orwell’s 1984 is an effectively
important scene from the novel because it depicts the strategy of The Party in
maintaining a positive presence in the face of the public for the purpose of
actually promoting the interests of the most prestigious class within societies
hierarchy of classes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)